
Rankings
Trophies
Rating Math
Date | Opponent | W/L/T | Score | GD | Opp Rating | Points | +/- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 3 | Carrick HS | L | 2 - 6 | -4 | 89.59 | 85.59 | -1.95 |
Nov 5 | Bishop Canevin HS | L | 2 - 3 | -1 | 88.50 | 87.50 | -0.04 |
Nov 12 | Burrell HS | W | 5 - 1 | 4 | 82.94 | 86.94 | -0.60 |
Nov 16 | Ringgold HS | L | 1 - 3 | -2 | 89.91 | 87.91 | 0.37 |
Dec 3 | Trinity HS | W | 7 - 0 | 7 | 82.31 | 89.31 | 1.77 |
Jan 18 | Avonworth HS | W | 7 - 2 | 5 | 86.01 | 91.01 | 3.47 |
Jan 21 | Central Valley HS | W | 4 - 3 | 1 | 81.59 | 82.59 | -4.95 |
Jan 28 | Ringgold HS | W | 3 - 2 | 1 | 89.91 | 90.91 | 3.37 |
Feb 1 | Elizabeth Forward HS | L | 5 - 6 | -1 | 85.81 | 84.81 | -2.73 |
Feb 4 | Avonworth HS | L | 5 - 6 | -1 | 86.01 | 85.01 | -2.53 |
Feb 8 | Carrick HS | L | 1 - 5 | -4 | 89.59 | 85.59 | -1.95 |
Feb 11 | Trinity HS | W | 8 - 0 | 7 | 82.31 | 89.31 | 1.77 |
Feb 22 | Burrell HS | W | 10 - 1 | 7 | 82.94 | 89.94 | 2.40 |
Feb 25 | Elizabeth Forward HS | L | 2 - 3 | -1 | 85.81 | 84.81 | -2.73 |
Mar 2 | Neshannock HS | W | 6 - 4 | 2 | 88.76 | 90.76 | 3.22 |
Mar 9 | Wilmington HS | L | 1 - 2 | -1 | 87.45 | 86.45 | -1.09 |
Mar 29 | Morgantown HS | W | 6 - 3 | 3 | 86.71 | 89.71 | 2.17 |
Apr 5 | Bishop Canevin HS | L | 2 - 3 | -1 | 88.50 | 87.50 | -0.04 |
Totals (18 games) | 9 - 9 - 0 | 77 - 53 | 21 | 1554.75 | 1575.75 | -0.07 | |
Averages | 1.16 | 86.37 | 87.54 | 0.00 |
Note: The maximum goal differential for any one game is 7 The average goal differential (GD) should equal this team's AGD from the rankings page. The average "Opp Rating" should equal this team's SCHED. The average "Points" is the team's rating. The average "+/-" should equal 0.00, but it is possible that rounding errors of 0.01 will occur occasionally. Larger error numbers indicate that a game scores has been changed or deleted since the last ratings calculation. The points and +/- columns give you an indication as to whether the team did better or worse than expected based upon MYHockey's ratings. Positive +/- numbers mean the team did better than expected and "helped" its rating. Games with negative numbers mean the team performed worse than expected.