
Nashville Warriors 11 AA
Rating
Record (W-L-T)
W-L-T
Goals (GF-GA)
GF-GA
Rankings
-
2nd
-
65th
Trophies
Rating Math
Date | Opponent | W/L/T | Score | GD | Opp Rating | Points | +/- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 15 | Rushmore Stampede 11 | W | 8 - 1 | 7 | 83.95 | 90.95 | 0.00 |
Sep 15 | Mountain Select 11 AA | W | 4 - 2 | 2 | 86.99 | 88.99 | -1.96 |
Sep 16 | Arizona Jr Sun Devils 11 AA | T | 2 - 2 | 0 | 89.84 | 89.84 | -1.11 |
Sep 16 | Boulder HC (Futures) A | W | 5 - 0 | 5 | 83.26 | 88.26 | -2.69 |
Sep 17 | Arizona Bobcats 11 AA | W | 10 - 1 | 7 | 85.12 | 92.12 | 1.17 |
Sep 29 | Biggby Coffee 11 AAA | W | 6 - 5 | 1 | 87.93 | 88.93 | -2.02 |
Sep 29 | Team Wisconsin 11 AAA | L | 1 - 2 | -1 | 92.85 | 91.85 | 0.90 |
Sep 30 | Boston Ice Dogs 11 AAA | W | 5 - 2 | 3 | 89.92 | 92.92 | 1.97 |
Sep 30 | Cincinnati Jr Cyclones (Banham) 11 AAA | L | 4 - 5 | -1 | 89.94 | 88.94 | -2.01 |
Oct 1 | Nashville Jr Predators 11 AAA | T | 3 - 3 | 0 | 92.21 | 92.21 | 1.26 |
Oct 7 | Cincinnati Jr Cyclones (Brennan) 11 AAA | W | 9 - 2 | 7 | 89.77 | 96.77 | 5.82 |
Oct 7 | Cincinnati Jr Cyclones (Brennan) 11 AAA | W | 3 - 2 | 1 | 89.77 | 90.77 | -0.18 |
Oct 8 | Cincinnati Jr Cyclones (Banham) 11 AAA | L | 2 - 6 | -4 | 89.94 | 85.94 | -5.01 |
Oct 8 | Cincinnati Jr Cyclones (Banham) 11 AAA | W | 5 - 2 | 3 | 89.94 | 92.94 | 1.99 |
Oct 20 | Pittsburgh Predators 11 AAA | W | 5 - 1 | 4 | 90.65 | 94.65 | 3.70 |
Oct 20 | Tri-State Spartans 11 AAA | W | 3 - 0 | 3 | 87.30 | 90.30 | -0.65 |
Oct 21 | Compuware 11 AAA | W | 5 - 2 | 3 | 90.67 | 93.67 | 2.72 |
Oct 21 | Carolina Junior Canes 11 AAA | L | 2 - 3 | -1 | 90.92 | 89.92 | -1.03 |
Nov 3 | Oakville Rangers (#2) 11 AAA | L | 1 - 2 | -1 | 92.84 | 91.84 | 0.89 |
Nov 3 | St Louis Knights 11 AA | W | 8 - 2 | 6 | 90.32 | 96.32 | 5.37 |
Nov 4 | Alaska Oilers (Scott) AA | W | 4 - 2 | 2 | 92.41 | 94.41 | 3.46 |
Nov 4 | Fox Motors 11 AAA | W | 4 - 3 | 1 | 90.66 | 91.66 | 0.71 |
Nov 5 | California Bears (#1) AA | L | 2 - 3 | -1 | 90.38 | 89.38 | -1.57 |
Dec 8 | Columbus Capitals (Blue) 11 AAA | W | 2 - 0 | 2 | 89.97 | 91.97 | 1.02 |
Dec 8 | Ohio Prospects 11 AAA | W | 3 - 0 | 3 | 87.88 | 90.88 | -0.07 |
Dec 9 | CarShield 11 AAA | L | 0 - 5 | -5 | 91.25 | 86.25 | -4.70 |
Dec 9 | Madison Capitols 11 AAA | L | 1 - 2 | -1 | 92.39 | 91.39 | 0.44 |
Dec 10 | Chicago Fury 11 AAA | T | 0 - 0 | 0 | 93.52 | 93.52 | 2.57 |
Jan 5 | Pittsburgh Esmark Stars (Red) 11 AAA | L | 3 - 4 | -1 | 91.34 | 90.34 | -0.61 |
Jan 5 | Pittsburgh Esmark Stars (White) 11 AAA | W | 3 - 1 | 2 | 87.01 | 89.01 | -1.94 |
Jan 6 | Pittsburgh Predators 11 AAA | L | 3 - 4 | -1 | 90.65 | 89.65 | -1.30 |
Jan 6 | Pittsburgh Vengeance 11 AAA | L | 2 - 5 | -3 | 92.23 | 89.23 | -1.72 |
Jan 7 | Texas Tigers 11 AA | W | 4 - 2 | 2 | 89.50 | 91.50 | 0.55 |
Feb 10 | CarShield 11 AAA | L | 1 - 3 | -2 | 91.25 | 89.25 | -1.70 |
Feb 10 | CarShield 11 AAA | W | 4 - 1 | 3 | 91.25 | 94.25 | 3.30 |
Feb 11 | CarShield 11 AAA | W | 2 - 1 | 1 | 91.25 | 92.25 | 1.30 |
Feb 17 | Boston Americans 11 AAA | L | 0 - 8 | -7 | 91.43 | 84.43 | -6.52 |
Feb 17 | Utica Jr Comets 11 AAA | T | 1 - 1 | 0 | 90.35 | 90.35 | -0.60 |
Feb 18 | Brantford 99ers 11 AAA | L | 0 - 2 | -2 | 92.07 | 90.07 | -0.88 |
Feb 18 | Flyers Youth AA | W | 3 - 1 | 2 | 87.95 | 89.95 | -1.00 |
Totals (40 games) | 22 - 14 - 4 | 133 - 93 | 39 | 3599.04 | 3638.04 | -0.13 | |
Averages | 0.97 | 89.97 | 90.95 | 0.00 |
Note: The maximum goal differential for any one game is 7 The average goal differential (GD) should equal this team's AGD from the rankings page. The average "Opp Rating" should equal this team's SCHED. The average "Points" is the team's rating. The average "+/-" should equal 0.00, but it is possible that rounding errors of 0.01 will occur occasionally. Larger error numbers indicate that a game scores has been changed or deleted since the last ratings calculation. The points and +/- columns give you an indication as to whether the team did better or worse than expected based upon MYHockey's ratings. Positive +/- numbers mean the team did better than expected and "helped" its rating. Games with negative numbers mean the team performed worse than expected.