
Rankings
Trophies
Rating Math
Date | Opponent | W/L/T | Score | GD | Opp Rating | Points | +/- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 4 | Casper HS | L | 4 - 12 | -7 | 81.49 | 74.49 | -6.18 |
Dec 5 | Park County HS | W | 7 - 2 | 5 | 75.90 | 80.90 | 0.23 |
Dec 6 | Park County HS | W | 12 - 3 | 7 | 75.90 | 82.90 | 2.23 |
Dec 11 | Casper HS | W | 6 - 4 | 2 | 81.49 | 83.49 | 2.82 |
Jan 8 | Gillette HS | L | 0 - 5 | -5 | 84.56 | 79.56 | -1.11 |
Jan 9 | Sheridan HS | L | 5 - 6 | -1 | 80.30 | 79.30 | -1.37 |
Jan 10 | Laramie HS | L | 2 - 5 | -3 | 81.95 | 78.95 | -1.72 |
Jan 23 | Jackson JV | W | 5 - 4 | 1 | 80.66 | 81.66 | 0.99 |
Jan 23 | Jackson HS | L | 2 - 6 | -4 | 82.49 | 78.49 | -2.18 |
Jan 24 | Jackson HS | L | 4 - 8 | -4 | 82.49 | 78.49 | -2.18 |
Jan 29 | Sheridan HS | W | 4 - 3 | 1 | 80.30 | 81.30 | 0.63 |
Jan 30 | Sheridan HS | T | 2 - 2 | 0 | 80.30 | 80.30 | -0.37 |
Jan 30 | Pinedale HS | L | 9 - 10 | -1 | 83.92 | 82.92 | 2.25 |
Jan 31 | Pinedale HS | W | 9 - 6 | 3 | 83.92 | 86.92 | 6.25 |
Feb 26 | Sheridan HS | W | 5 - 4 | 1 | 80.30 | 81.30 | 0.63 |
Feb 27 | Park County HS | W | 12 - 4 | 7 | 75.90 | 82.90 | 2.23 |
Feb 28 | Casper HS | L | 3 - 7 | -4 | 81.49 | 77.49 | -3.18 |
Totals (17 games) | 8 - 8 - 1 | 91 - 91 | -2 | 1373.40 | 1371.40 | -0.03 | |
Averages | -0.11 | 80.78 | 80.67 | 0.00 |
Note: The maximum goal differential for any one game is 7 The average goal differential (GD) should equal this team's AGD from the rankings page. The average "Opp Rating" should equal this team's SCHED. The average "Points" is the team's rating. The average "+/-" should equal 0.00, but it is possible that rounding errors of 0.01 will occur occasionally. Larger error numbers indicate that a game scores has been changed or deleted since the last ratings calculation. The points and +/- columns give you an indication as to whether the team did better or worse than expected based upon MYHockey's ratings. Positive +/- numbers mean the team did better than expected and "helped" its rating. Games with negative numbers mean the team performed worse than expected.