Your browser is not supported. Please use a newer browser for the full MHR experience.

LiveBarn
Team

Wausau Cyclones (NA3HL)

Wisconsin

Rating

88.52

Record

34-16-0

W-L-T

Goals

202-131

GF-GA

Association

Independent

Division(s)

Head Coach

+

Team Manager

+

Rankings

Trophies

NAHL

Rating Math

DateOpponentW/L/TScoreGDOpp RatingPoints+/-
Sep 13Peoria Mustangs (NA3HL)W 6 - 0 6 84.44 90.44 1.92
Sep 14Peoria Mustangs (NA3HL)W 7 - 2 5 84.44 89.44 0.92
Sep 20Wisconsin Woodsmen (NA3HL)L 2 - 3 -1 87.67 86.67 -1.85
Sep 27Minnesota Moose (NA3HL)W 7 - 3 4 87.06 91.06 2.54
Sep 28Minnesota Moose (NA3HL)W 4 - 2 2 87.06 89.06 0.54
Oct 4Peoria Mustangs (NA3HL)W 5 - 1 4 84.44 88.44 -0.08
Oct 5Peoria Mustangs (NA3HL)W 6 - 1 5 84.44 89.44 0.92
Oct 11Wisconsin Woodsmen (NA3HL)W 4 - 2 2 87.67 89.67 1.15
Oct 12Wisconsin Woodsmen (NA3HL)W 7 - 1 6 87.67 93.67 5.15
Oct 18St Louis Jr Blues (NA3HL)W 5 - 3 2 85.91 87.91 -0.61
Oct 19St Louis Jr Blues (NA3HL)W 4 - 1 3 85.91 88.91 0.39
Oct 25West Bend Power (NA3HL)W 6 - 5 1 88.58 89.58 1.06
Oct 26West Bend Power (NA3HL)L 2 - 3 -1 88.58 87.58 -0.94
Nov 1Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)W 3 - 2 1 88.12 89.12 0.60
Nov 2Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)L 4 - 5 -1 88.12 87.12 -1.40
Nov 15Peoria Mustangs (NA3HL)W 7 - 4 3 84.44 87.44 -1.08
Nov 16Peoria Mustangs (NA3HL)W 8 - 0 8 84.44 92.44 3.92
Nov 22West Bend Power (NA3HL)L 0 - 3 -3 88.58 85.58 -2.94
Nov 23West Bend Power (NA3HL)L 1 - 5 -4 88.58 84.58 -3.94
Nov 29St Louis Jr Blues (NA3HL)L 0 - 4 -4 85.91 81.91 -6.61
Nov 30St Louis Jr Blues (NA3HL)W 8 - 1 7 85.91 92.91 4.39
Dec 13West Bend Power (NA3HL)L 2 - 5 -3 88.58 85.58 -2.94
Dec 15Helena Bighorns (NA3HL)L 1 - 2 -1 87.98 86.98 -1.54
Dec 16Texas Brahmas (NA3HL)L 0 - 4 -4 87.54 83.54 -4.98
Dec 17Granite City Lumberjacks (NA3HL)W 3 - 2 1 89.42 90.42 1.90
Dec 20Wisconsin Woodsmen (NA3HL)W 5 - 4 1 87.67 88.67 0.15
Dec 21Wisconsin Woodsmen (NA3HL)L 3 - 6 -3 87.67 84.67 -3.85
Dec 27Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)W 6 - 5 1 88.12 89.12 0.60
Dec 28Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)L 2 - 3 -1 88.12 87.12 -1.40
Jan 3Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)L 3 - 6 -3 88.12 85.12 -3.40
Jan 4Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)W 4 - 1 3 88.12 91.12 2.60
Jan 10Minnesota Wilderness (NA3HL)W 4 - 3 1 86.83 87.83 -0.69
Jan 11Minnesota Wilderness (NA3HL)W 5 - 3 2 86.83 88.83 0.31
Jan 17Wisconsin Woodsmen (NA3HL)W 4 - 2 2 87.67 89.67 1.15
Jan 18Wisconsin Woodsmen (NA3HL)W 3 - 1 2 87.67 89.67 1.15
Jan 25Wisconsin Woodsmen (NA3HL)W 4 - 3 1 87.67 88.67 0.15
Feb 1St Louis Jr Blues (NA3HL)L 1 - 5 -4 85.91 81.91 -6.61
Feb 2St Louis Jr Blues (NA3HL)W 4 - 2 2 85.91 87.91 -0.61
Feb 7St Louis Jr Blues (NA3HL)W 5 - 2 3 85.91 88.91 0.39
Feb 8St Louis Jr Blues (NA3HL)W 7 - 0 7 85.91 92.91 4.39
Feb 14West Bend Power (NA3HL)W 3 - 0 3 88.58 91.58 3.06
Feb 15West Bend Power (NA3HL)W 3 - 2 1 88.58 89.58 1.06
Feb 21Peoria Mustangs (NA3HL)W 8 - 0 8 84.44 92.44 3.92
Feb 22Peoria Mustangs (NA3HL)W 7 - 0 7 84.44 91.44 2.92
Feb 28Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)W 5 - 2 3 88.12 91.12 2.60
Mar 7Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)W 5 - 0 5 88.12 93.12 4.60
Mar 8West Bend Power (NA3HL)L 1 - 7 -6 88.58 82.58 -5.94
Mar 14Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)L 2 - 3 -1 88.12 87.12 -1.40
Mar 15Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)W 5 - 2 3 88.12 91.12 2.60
Mar 16Rochester Grizzlies (NA3HL)L 1 - 5 -4 88.12 84.12 -4.40
Totals (50 games)34 - 16 - 0202 - 131714355.194426.19-0.16
Averages1.4287.1088.520.00

Note: The maximum goal differential for any one game is 20 The average goal differential (GD) should equal this team's AGD from the rankings page. The average "Opp Rating" should equal this team's SCHED. The average "Points" is the team's rating. The average "+/-" should equal 0.00, but it is possible that rounding errors of 0.01 will occur occasionally. Larger error numbers indicate that a game scores has been changed or deleted since the last ratings calculation. The points and +/- columns give you an indication as to whether the team did better or worse than expected based upon MYHockey's ratings. Positive +/- numbers mean the team did better than expected and "helped" its rating. Games with negative numbers mean the team performed worse than expected.