LA Lions 16U
Rating
Record (W-L-T)
W-L-T
Goals (GF-GA)
GF-GA
Rankings
-
61st
-
111th
Trophies
Rating Math
| Date | Opponent | W/L/T | Score | GD | Opp Rating | Points | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28 | Sno-King Jr Thunderbirds 16U | W | 2 - 1 | 1 | 89.24 | 90.24 | 3.05 |
| Sep 28 | Arizona Kachinas (Green) 16U | L | 1 - 5 | -4 | 90.70 | 86.70 | -0.49 |
| Sep 29 | San Jose Jr Sharks (Tier1) 16U | L | 0 - 2 | -2 | 92.15 | 90.15 | 2.96 |
| Sep 29 | Sno-King Jr Thunderbirds 16U | L | 0 - 5 | -5 | 89.24 | 84.24 | -2.95 |
| Oct 12 | Minuteman Lady Flames (Gold) 16U | L | 0 - 4 | -4 | 90.83 | 86.83 | -0.36 |
| Oct 12 | Boston Advantage 16U | L | 0 - 7 | -7 | 91.44 | 84.44 | -2.75 |
| Oct 13 | Philadelphia Jr Flyers (Black) 16U | L | 1 - 4 | -3 | 89.26 | 86.26 | -0.93 |
| Oct 13 | Ontario Hockey Academy U18 A | L | 0 - 4 | -4 | 88.67 | 84.67 | -2.52 |
| Oct 14 | Princeton Tiger Lilies (Tier1) 16U | L | 0 - 2 | -2 | 89.43 | 87.43 | 0.24 |
| Oct 26 | Arizona Kachinas (Green) 16U | L | 0 - 4 | -4 | 90.70 | 86.70 | -0.49 |
| Oct 26 | Stockton St Marys HS | L | 0 - 4 | -4 | 89.48 | 85.48 | -1.71 |
| Oct 27 | Arizona Kachinas (Green) 16U | L | 1 - 8 | -7 | 90.70 | 83.70 | -3.49 |
| Oct 27 | Anaheim Lady Ducks (Tier1) 16U | L | 1 - 2 | -1 | 90.14 | 89.14 | 1.95 |
| Nov 23 | San Jose Jr Sharks (Tier1) 16U | L | 0 - 7 | -7 | 92.15 | 85.15 | -2.04 |
| Nov 23 | Sno-King Jr Thunderbirds 16U | L | 0 - 4 | -4 | 89.24 | 85.24 | -1.95 |
| Nov 24 | Anaheim Lady Ducks (Tier1) 16U | W | 2 - 1 | 1 | 90.14 | 91.14 | 3.95 |
| Nov 24 | San Jose Jr Sharks (Tier1) 16U | L | 0 - 5 | -5 | 92.15 | 87.15 | -0.04 |
| Dec 6 | Fox Motors 16U | L | 0 - 1 | -1 | 90.81 | 89.81 | 2.62 |
| Dec 7 | Ohio Blue Jackets 16U | L | 0 - 4 | -4 | 87.60 | 83.60 | -3.59 |
| Dec 21 | Stockton St Marys HS | L | 1 - 4 | -3 | 89.48 | 86.48 | -0.71 |
| Dec 21 | San Jose Jr Sharks (Tier1) 16U | L | 2 - 5 | -3 | 92.15 | 89.15 | 1.96 |
| Dec 22 | Stockton St Marys HS | L | 2 - 3 | -1 | 89.48 | 88.48 | 1.29 |
| Dec 22 | Anaheim Lady Ducks (Tier1) 16U | L | 0 - 1 | -1 | 90.14 | 89.14 | 1.95 |
| Jan 18 | Carolina Junior Canes (Tier1) 16U | L | 0 - 3 | -3 | 90.45 | 87.45 | 0.26 |
| Jan 18 | Arizona Kachinas (Green) 16U | L | 1 - 9 | -7 | 90.70 | 83.70 | -3.49 |
| Jan 19 | Team Illinois 16U | L | 1 - 5 | -4 | 93.09 | 89.09 | 1.90 |
| Jan 19 | Pembina Valley Hawks U18 AAA | L | 0 - 6 | -6 | 91.59 | 85.59 | -1.60 |
| Jan 31 | Anaheim Lady Ducks (Tier1) 16U | L | 0 - 3 | -3 | 90.14 | 87.14 | -0.05 |
| Jan 31 | San Jose Jr Sharks (Tier1) 16U | L | 3 - 4 | -1 | 92.15 | 91.15 | 3.96 |
| Feb 1 | Anaheim Lady Ducks (Tier1) 16U | L | 1 - 2 | -1 | 90.14 | 89.14 | 1.95 |
| Feb 1 | San Jose Jr Sharks (Tier1) 16U | L | 1 - 5 | -4 | 92.15 | 88.15 | 0.96 |
| Feb 7 | Team Colorado 16U | L | 1 - 6 | -5 | 92.20 | 87.20 | 0.01 |
| Feb 7 | Bishop Kearney Selects 16U | L | 0 - 3 | -3 | 95.26 | 92.26 | 5.07 |
| Feb 8 | Detroit Honeybaked (Tier1) 16U | L | 0 - 4 | -4 | 91.92 | 87.92 | 0.73 |
| Feb 8 | Ohio Blue Jackets 16U | L | 0 - 2 | -2 | 87.60 | 85.60 | -1.59 |
| Mar 7 | Sno-King Jr Thunderbirds 16U | L | 0 - 4 | -4 | 89.24 | 85.24 | -1.95 |
| Mar 8 | San Jose Jr Sharks (Tier1) 16U | L | 0 - 14 | -7 | 92.15 | 85.15 | -2.04 |
| Totals (37 games) | 2 - 35 - 0 | 21 - 157 | -128 | 3354.24 | 3226.24 | 0.07 | |
| Averages | -3.45 | 90.65 | 87.19 | 0.00 | |||
Note: The maximum goal differential for any one game is 7 The average goal differential (GD) should equal this team's AGD from the rankings page. The average "Opp Rating" should equal this team's SCHED. The average "Points" is the team's rating. The average "+/-" should equal 0.00, but it is possible that rounding errors of 0.01 will occur occasionally. Larger error numbers indicate that a game scores has been changed or deleted since the last ratings calculation. The points and +/- columns give you an indication as to whether the team did better or worse than expected based upon MYHockey's ratings. Positive +/- numbers mean the team did better than expected and "helped" its rating. Games with negative numbers mean the team performed worse than expected.
